RE: [ubl-ssc] Proposal from China/F2F for enhanced structure

["Sue Probert" <sue.probert@dial.pipex.com>]

Hi Stephen

 

If the spreadsheet structure is to be reviewed to cover ACCs as well, then I suggest that the latest TBG17 submission template structure should be taken into consideration. Marion can provide this as the UNBL liaison to TBG17.  The closer that these two spreadsheet templates become, the easier the submission to the UN/CEFACT ACC Library harmonisation process becomes. Also, as EDIFIX understands the TBG17 format this should make for less unnecessary mapping exercises.

 

regards

 

Sue

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Green [mailto:stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk]
Sent: 20 May 2005 12:43
To: ubl-ssc@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ubl-ssc] Proposal from China/F2F for enhanced structure

Greetings

 

I have it down that we should be meeting next

Thursday so I thought I'd propose that we

take a little time to consider the proposals

from China (following plenary discussions)

for how to enhance the spreadsheets'

modular structure to cater for expansion

and CC requirements.

 

I'm not sure how the timescale is envisiaged

for this. I'm also concerned to get feedback

on how things will be if we don't have a set

of instructions from NDR team until near the

end of June (as the schedules have been

indicating recently).

 

I wrote to the TC a response (sorry it was hurried

and poorly set out due to time constraints) to the

spreadsheets proposal which might help discussion.

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200505/msg00068.html

 

I've also prototyped another set of schemas

to see whether version 2.0 could easily use

the ATG2 datatype schemas and how future

minor releases might use polymorphism. This

isn't yet agreed in NDR but might have been

discussed in the Wed Atlantic call in time for

our meeting on Thursday.

http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200505/msg00067.html

 

Would folk be able to attend Thursday?

It might be agood idea to aim to attend

the Wed TC call too as I hope there will

be further discussion of the 2.0 schema

requirements.

 

All the best

 

Steve