[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl-tsc] Resolving issues on Issues List
I have no objection to your suggestion. Rgds Kama -----Original Message----- From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2006 9:42 AM To: ubl-tsc@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ubl-tsc] Resolving issues on Issues List In trying to finalize this list there are a few items we never concluded. The first was: ISS-145 "Semantic definitions of document description are not aligned with UNCL" (from Dave F. and TBG3) One difference is that the UBL Forwarding Instruction is called in UNCL 1001 "Forwarding Instructions" (with an "s"). Apart from that the new document types have the same names as the UNCL counterparts. One suggestion is that we could rename the "Forwarding Instruction" document to "Forwarding Instructions" and make "Forwarding Instruction" a business term for it. This means we follow UNCL 1001 exactly. Does anyone object to this change? -- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]