[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: [ubl] Global vs. Local -- Gunther's Recommendation
Hello Jim, I've seen there is a little mistake in my position paper. I copied the template from another position paper and I forgotten to change the abstract. The current and wrong abstract says: This position paper outlines the use and definition of facets within the UBL library content. But the correct abstract must be: This position paper outlines the reusability and efficiency of global declared elements versus local defined elements. Kind regards, Gunther -----Original Message----- From: Jim Wilson [mailto:jim.wilson@kcx.com] Sent: Dienstag, 25. Februar 2003 19:26 To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [ubl] Global vs. Local -- Gunther's Recommendation UBL Team, Greetings from cold, cold Kansas City. Moments ago Gunther delivered to me his much-anticipated Global vs. Local recommendation. Jon suggested and the TC agreed to a moderated discussion of Gunther's recommendation on this list. We're getting a bit of a late start, so everyone needs to be more constructive than ever when posting over the next few days. We have a 2 March deadline to complete this discussion unless Lisa or Jon directs me to extend it. I've attached Gunther's document. I converted his original Word document to PDF with line numbers and bookmarks. Included in the PDF are the minutes from the last NDRSC discussion on the topic for your convenience (refer to the archives for more information). I also included Gunther's original Word document in case you want to check for better image quality. Sorry about the attachment size, but I'm sure you understand in this case. Review the following ground rules and then weigh in with your opinions. By the way, I'm the moderator. Discussion Guidelines ---------------------------- 1. Focus on Gunther's recommendation and supporting arguments. Do not rehash past discussions unless they are relevant to Gunther's recommendation and supporting arguments. 2. Validate Gunther's discussion of "the global problem" (my term). Consider whether or not the problem really exists and the degree to which the problem would impact stakeholders--end users especially. 3. Validate that Gunther's recommendation addresses the problem. 4. Consider whether or not Gunther's recommendation, if accepted, would introduce new problems. If so, what are their implications? Which set of problems minimizes negative impact on the stakeholders? 5. Be sure that you DO NOT somehow reply and include the attached file. 6. Refer to numbered sections, pages, and line numbers when appropriate. Yes, I know, it's common sense. 7. Moderator suggestions are welcome when sent to jim.wilson@kcx.com. Best regards, Jim Wilson 816-525-2000 work 816-516-8847 mobile jim.wilson@kcx.com
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC