Re: [ubl] Outcomes of joint SC call 2004.04.02

[Tim McGrath <tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au>]

i will volunteer to be part of this.  but i would add that there are 
more deliverables than just schemas for UBL 1.1

first, a priority has to be the UBL position for the OAG meeting at the 
end of April.  we must have a clear statement of what we will be doing 
for 1.1, if they agree to align.  we cannot still be debating what to do 
internally.

second, is the joint OAG/UBL submission to  the mutually agreed upon 
standards organization such as UN/CEFACT ATG2 or ISO.


jon.bosak@sun.com wrote:

>[tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au:]
>
>| >Most importantly, this plan has not yet been presented to
>| >      the OAG membership, so we cannot be sure that changes we
>| >      implement in UBL 1.0 will match changes implemented in OAGIS
>| >      9.0.  We should know more about this following the OAG
>| >      meeting scheduled for the end of this month.
>| 
>| is there an action to ensure UBL's committed position on item (2) and 
>| (3) will be finalised by then? I think the onus is on us to take the 
>| initaitive or we will just cycle round again.
>
>I think that two things are needed here:
>
>1. The inclusion of CCTS schema alignment on our "to do" list for
>   1.1.  I've already got this entered on a list that I will be
>   putting out for review and approval once we've got the 1.0
>   packaging done.
>
>2. The appointment of a team to actually engage with our
>   counterparts in OAG so that we have something done in time for
>   1.1.  This is harder.  Are there volunteers?
>
>Jon
>
>
>
>To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.
>
>  
>

-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160