Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: [ubl-clsc] Groups - wd-ublclsc-codelist-20040414.doc uploaded
On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 13:32:06 +0200, <email@example.com> wrote: > Regarding the CLSC document, lines 34 and following read, > "...a substitution group mechanism required for extensibility in the > XMLSchema mapping, that while not formally adopted for 1.0, will be the > bedrock for future 1.1 initiatives in this area" > > Certainly "..will be the bedrock for future 1.1 initiatives in this > area.." is out of line with my recollection of the agreement. > It was agreed that we'd make looking at it a high priority for 1.1, so > it mustn't be said at this stage whether it "will be the bedrock for > future 1.1 initiatives". That remains to be considered. I agree entirely with Stephen (and my apologies that I missed this when reviewing the document myself). A version 1.0 document should not try to predict what might happen in version 1.1. Whatever happens will happen, and that will then be documented in the version 1.1 documents. Cheers, Tony. -- Anthony B. Coates London Market Systems Limited 33 Throgmorton Street, London, EC2N 2BR http://www.londonmarketsystems.com/ mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026 [MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language), http://www.mddl.org/] [FpML Arch WG Member (Financial Products Markup Language), http://www.fpml.org/] ----------------------------------------------------------------------- This Email may contain confidential information and/or copyright material and is intended for the use of the addressee only. Any unauthorised use may be unlawful. If you receive this Email by mistake please advise the sender immediately by using the reply facility in your e-mail software. Email is not a secure method of communication and London Market Systems Limited cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this email for virus infection, for which London Market Systems Limited accepts no responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of London Market Systems Limited.