[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: AW: [ubl] Schema edit test
[dill2@gefeg.com:] | Jon,are the changes below ideas for the future or reality for 1.0? Reality for 1.0. We remembered at the last minute that we had an NDR requirement to provide stripped versions of the schemas. | If the latter one is the case, then please note that the | generation of the UBL schemas includes their relative pathes. It | would be nice to know what a decision is and what an idea. I based the revised directory organization on the relative path names. Both the annotated and nonannotated versions seem to work fine in this structure (though I would like independent confirmation of this if people have time to look at the build due out tonight over the weekend). Jon
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]