Re: [ubl] Comment Disposition Clarification: 1.6

["Stephen Green" <stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk>]

Mike

At present it is possible to have (and we do have it) in one place
AddressLine
following Address (quite rightly) and, in the same Schema, elsewhere to have
AddressLineType preceding AddressType.
This is because '..Type' is included when deciding the order alphabetically
- T comes after L.
We need a rule to say that Schema-associated terms such as the 'Type'
suffix should be ignored when calculating the order (wherever the order
is not dictated by the model, e.g. when producing an xsd:sequence).
(And case isn't really a factor.)

That's my recollection of the result of the Pacific call on 1st July.

All the best

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Grimley Michael J NPRI" <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>
To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:47 PM
Subject: [ubl] Comment Disposition Clarification: 1.6


> Greetings,
>
> Disposition states: "Need NDR rule,...".
>
> This would be a rule stating that case will *not* be considered when
alphabetizing schema elements, correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Grimley
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php
.
>