Re: [ubl] Comment Disposition Clarification: 1.6

[<MCRAWFORD@lmi.org>]

Title: Re: [ubl] Comment Disposition Clarification: 1.6

I guess I am a little slow here (vacations will do that) but what is the purpose of this rule and where do I put it?

Also, I hope to have the ndr out next week and need to know if there are any other new rules or changes to existing rules that have surfaced in the last month?
Mark R. Crawford
Senior Research Fellow - LMI XML Lead
W3C Advisory Committee, OASIS, RosettaNet Representative
Vice Chair - OASIS UBL TC & Chair Naming and Design Rules Subcommittee
Chair - UN/CEFACT XML Syntax Working Group
Editor - UN/CEFACT Core Components
--
LMI Government Consulting
2000 Corporate Ridge
McLean, VA 22102-7805
703.917.7177 Phone
703.655.4810 Wireless
The opportunity to make a difference has never been greater
www.lmi.org

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Green <stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk>
To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thu Jul 15 16:13:43 2004
Subject: Re: [ubl] Comment Disposition Clarification: 1.6

Mike

At present it is possible to have (and we do have it) in one place
AddressLine
following Address (quite rightly) and, in the same Schema, elsewhere to have
AddressLineType preceding AddressType.
This is because '..Type' is included when deciding the order alphabetically
- T comes after L.
We need a rule to say that Schema-associated terms such as the 'Type'
suffix should be ignored when calculating the order (wherever the order
is not dictated by the model, e.g. when producing an xsd:sequence).
(And case isn't really a factor.)

That's my recollection of the result of the Pacific call on 1st July.

All the best

Steve

----- Original Message -----
From: "Grimley Michael J NPRI" <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>
To: <ubl@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Thursday, July 15, 2004 8:47 PM
Subject: [ubl] Comment Disposition Clarification: 1.6


> Greetings,
>
> Disposition states: "Need NDR rule,...".
>
> This would be a rule stating that case will *not* be considered when
alphabetizing schema elements, correct?
>
> Thanks,
> Mike Grimley
>
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of
the OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php
.
>


To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.