OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [ubl] Re: what to do about namespaces in schemas




On 07/19/2004 01:04 PM, Stephen Green wrote:
> Eduardo
> 
> Thanks for these comments. I thought, looking at the rule, that it should be
> changed to xmlns="urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:Order:1:0"

oops, my mistake, you are right.

> or is that what it should be prior to standards approval?
> 
> Also, should we be going back to prefixing with draft numbers until we are
> sure
> we have a bug-free set of Schemas?

That would be prudent, certainly, but the moment it is presented for membership
approval it should be as ...Order:1:0

If it is rejected as a Standard by membership and a later version is subsequently
re-presented for Standard approval, the version number would or would not change
depending on whether the Schemas are touched or not.

> 
> Steve
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Eduardo Gutentag" <Eduardo.Gutentag@Sun.COM>
> To: "Grimley Michael J NPRI" <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>
> Cc: <Anne.Hendry@Sun.COM>; <mcrawford@lmi.org>; <Jon.Bosak@Sun.COM>;
> <stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk>
> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 7:50 PM
> Subject: Re: what to do about namespaces in schemas
> 
> 
> 
>>Right,
>>
>>changing
>>
>>xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:Order:1:0"
>>to
>>xmlns="urn:oasis:names:ubl:Order:1:0"
>>
>>(and others accordingly) should be enough. Unless what is being changed is
>>the TC spec previous to Standards approval. If that is the case then we
> 
> would
> 
>>have to re-think this answer...
>>
>>On 07/16/2004 06:27 AM, Grimley Michael J NPRI wrote:
>>
>>>Anne,
>>>
>>>To answer Question 1, see Rule NMS5:
>>>
>>>    [NMS5] The namespace names for UBL Schemas holding OASIS Standard
> 
> status MUST be of the form:
> 
>>>
> urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:<name>:<major>:<minor>
> 
>>>This pretty much answers Question 2 as well, because it is version 1.0
> 
> of the OASIS spec. (The other was 1.0 of the TC draft.)
> 
>>>Thank You,
>>>MikeG
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Anne Hendry [mailto:anne.hendry@sun.com]
>>>Sent: Thursday, 15 July 2004 21 24
>>>To: mcrawford@lmi.org; Eduardo.Gutentag; GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil;
> 
> jon.bosak@sun.com
> 
>>>Cc: stephen_green@seventhproject.co.uk
>>>Subject: what to do about namespaces in schemas
>>>
>>>Since we are changing the schemas we are wondering how to handle the
> 
> updating of the namespace in a couple of ways.  Where we have, for example,
> 
>>>    xmlns="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:Order:1:0"
>>>    xmlns:ccts="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CoreComponentParameters:1:0"
>>>    xmlns:cbc="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CommonBasicComponents:1:0"
>>>    xmlns:cac="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:CommonAggregateComponents:1:0"
>>>
>>>
> 
> xmlns:res="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:codelist:AcknowledgementResponseCode:1:0"
> 
>>>    xmlns:udt="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:UnspecializedDatatypes:1:0"
>>>    xmlns:sdt="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:SpecializedDatatypes:1:0"
>>>    xmlns:cur="urn:oasis:names:tc:ubl:codelist:CurrencyCode:1:0"
>>>
>>>1. Do we need to change the 'tc' part now that it's becoming an OASIS
> 
> spec, 2. Do we also need to change the 1:0 part since we these schemas will
> be different than the earlier 1:0 schemas we released?  We could have it as
> 1.0-draft-1, or 1.0.1 or something like that.  Or are we intending that
> everyone that receives this final release will replace any previous one
> marked '1.0'.  This could cause a lot of confusiion, though, as I'm not sure
> how one would identify the 'correct' 1.0 schemas once they were installed
> and/or circulated.
> 
>>>This needs to be thought out now because we're changing the ccp schema
> 
> now and this may well never be changed again without any other reason.
> 
>>>Stephen/Anne
>>>
>>
>>--
>>Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
>>Web Technologies and Standards |         Phone:  +1 510 550 4616 x31442
>>Sun Microsystems Inc.          |         W3C AC Rep / OASIS BoD
>>
> 
> 
> 
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the OASIS TC), go to http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php.
> 

-- 
Eduardo Gutentag               |         e-mail: eduardo.gutentag@Sun.COM
Web Technologies and Standards |         Phone:  +1 510 550 4616 x31442
Sun Microsystems Inc.          |         W3C AC Rep / OASIS BoD


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]