[ubl] UBL 1.1 Additions - Invoicing Requirements

["Michael Dill" <dill2@gefeg.com>]

Hi,
5th January the latest TBG Library has been sent (both as spreadsheets and
EF55) to the TBG17 list of voting members. The UBL representative could
forward these data to the UBL list.
Regarding the spreadsheets please be aware that there is a column Z, where
the entries are distinguished by different status of harmonization.

Michael

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
Gesendet: Montag, 17. Januar 2005 01:43
An: marion.royal@gsa.gov
Cc: ubl
Betreff: Re: [ubl] UBL 1.1 Additions - Invoicing Requirements


thanks for emphasizing this. if you can supply the latest drafts from
TBG17 it would certainly help us decide how to dispose of these.

i think the question we should ask is "How does this map to the TBG17
draft CCs?"

as far as the question you pose. i cannot see why we wouldn't (by
default) submit all new CCs (decontextualized BIE) we encounter to TBG17.

marion.royal@gsa.gov wrote:

> Tim,
> I haven't had the time to look at these in detail yet, but you might
> add criteria that considers published and pending TBG17 ACCs.
> At minimum, the question should be added - Shall a new ACC be
> submitted to TBG17?
>
> Kindest regards,
> Marion
>
> --------------------------
> Sent from my BlackBerry Wireless Handheld
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tim McGrath" [tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au]
> Sent: 01/15/2005 05:03 PM
> To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [ubl] UBL 1.1 Additions - Invoicing Requirements
>
> In preparation for discussion on this week's Pacific call, we need to
> review the first set of proposed UBL 1.1 additions for improved
> Invoicing capabilities.
> In particular the following suggestions....
> Invoice. InvoicingPeriod
> Invoice. DeliveryTerms
> Invoice. InitialInvoiceDocumentReference
> Invoice. RequisitionistDocumentReference
> Legal Total. RoundOffAmount
> Payment Means. PayeePartyName
> Tax Sub Total. InitialInvoiceTaxAmount
> Financial Account. PaymentInstructionID
>
> The justifications for these additions are given in the document
> attached to the email archived at:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200412/msg00032.html
>
> in addition, the proposals for...
> Allowance Charge. AllowanceChargeBaseAmount
> Tax Sub Total. TaxCurrencyTaxAmount
> - are further explained in the email archived at:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl/200501/msg00018.html
>
> Those wishing to participate in this discussion should assess these
> items in terms of:
> a. does their business case satisfy a 'reasonableness' test? is it a
> 'reasonably' common requirement?
> b. is the proposed solution the best one for the business requirement?
> is there a better way of providing this?
> c. would the addition be a new BBIE, a new ABIE , a new BBIE, a new
> code list or a new document type?
> d. is the proposed naming appropriate? (property terms, representation
> term, qualifiers, etc.)
> e. do we have enough information to dispose of this request?
>
>

--
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160

DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business
Informatics and Web Services
(coming soon from MIT Press)
http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?sid=632C40AB-4E94-4930-A94E
-22FF8CA5641F&ttype=2&tid=10476





To unsubscribe from this mailing list (and be removed from the roster of the
OASIS TC), go to
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ubl/members/leave_workgroup.php
.