Re: [ubl] Candidate approach for W3C Schema with wild cards for code list value validation

["Anthony B. Coates" <abcoates@londonmarketsystems.com>]

Hi Ken,

On Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:42:33 +0100, G. Ken Holman  
<gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com> wrote:

> I then created "maindoc\CL-Invoice-1.0.xsd" which allows anything  
> anywhere, but with lax validation, so that if any other declarations are  
> present, those are validated.  That imports:

Using the 'oXygen' editor, which uses the Xerces-J Schema validator, the  
following errors are reported for your Schema:

----
Location: 10:50
Description: E sch-props-correct.2: A schema cannot contain two global  
components with the same name; this schema contains two occurrences of  
'urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CurrencyCode-1.0,CurrencyCodeContentType'.
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#sch-props-correct

Location: 1183:44
Description: E sch-props-correct.2: A schema cannot contain two global  
components with the same name; this schema contains two occurrences of  
'urn:oasis:names:specification:ubl:schema:xsd:CurrencyCode-1.0,CurrencyCodeType'.
URL: http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#sch-props-correct

Location: 16:21
Description: E s4s-elt-invalid-content.1: The content of  
'#AnonType_Invoice' is invalid.  Element 'sequence' is invalid, misplaced,  
or occurs too often.

Location: 1207:49
Description: E s4s-att-not-allowed: Attribute 'processContent' cannot  
appear in element 'anyAttribute'.
----

In terms of whether one should trust Xerces-J versus XSV, I believe the  
W3C Schema WG themselves currently consider Xerces to be the most correct  
Schema validator available.  It is certainly the most widely used Java  
validator.

Cheers, Tony.
-- 
Anthony B. Coates
London Market Systems Limited
33 Throgmorton Street, London, EC2N 2BR, UK
http://www.londonmarketsystems.com/
mailto:abcoates@londonmarketsystems.com
Mobile/Cell: +44 (79) 0543 9026
[MDDL Editor (Market Data Definition Language), http://www.mddl.org/]
[FpML Arch WG Member (Financial Products Markup Language),  
http://www.fpml.org/]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
This Email may contain confidential information and/or copyright material  
and is intended for the use of the addressee only.  Any unauthorised use  
may be unlawful. If you receive this Email by mistake please advise the  
sender immediately by using the reply  facility in your e-mail software.   
Email is not a secure method of communication and London Market Systems  
Limited cannot accept responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of  
this message or any attachment(s). Please examine this email for virus  
infection, for which London Market Systems Limited accepts no  
responsibility. If verification of this email is sought then please  
request a hard copy. Unless otherwise stated any views or opinions  
presented are solely those of the author and do not represent those of  
London Market Systems Limited.