[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] AW: two Libraries
Michael Hi. Well, some of these issues are similar to those I was raising but I eventually agreed this architecture as long is it doesn't affect schemas. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Dill" <dill2@gefeg.com> > 1. Shall the two Libraries become two reusable schemas or one? one > 2. The Common stuff uses ABIEs, which are in the Procurement list. a) is > this a mistake or intention? a mistake, which ones? > b) How can Common be called Common, if it uses > objects from a more specific Procurement? exactly my point too but I gave in :-) (the theory is it will be common to both Procurement and Transport but my point was that that isn't enough to warrant the term 'Common'). It does make some sense to have the Common spreadsheet since most of it appears in the same way in every document (but that is because the documents are for the Procurement context so it remains to be seen if the same applies if and when we add new contexts). > c) as you are calling the excel > stuff now models, then please tell me, whether we shall have two models or a > combined one? we could have any number of representations or artifacts but it is essentially all one model > This circular can easily end with a recursion > > BTW: I do not understand the reason to have two Libraries. Is there any > document, which describes the reason? Just a lot of emails and minuted discussions, but you're asking the wrong person :-) All the best Steve > > Michael Dill > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS > at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]