RE: [ubl] Re: ubl-validation-error

["Sylvia Webb" <swebb@gefeg.com>]

Tim,
 
Christine is correct. Most of the uDTs and Codelist qDTs don't have a
definition.

Regards,
Sylvia
________________________________

From: Tim McGrath [mailto:tmcgrath@portcomm.com.au] 
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 12:34 AM
To: Christine Spietz
Cc: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ubl] Re: ubl-validation-error


thank you christine (and jean-luc), i will pass this onto the relevant group
within UBL and someone will respond shortly.

this should be valuable input as we develop UBL 2.0.

Christine Spietz wrote:


	Dear Mister McGrath,
	 
	I wrote the following mail to Jean-Luc Champion and he told me, that
you might be the right person to send this:
	 
	I want to inform you about validation-errors in ubl-schemes.
	Our schemes are based on parts of UBL. By validating our schemes
with the 
	w3c-Tool XSV I also found some errors in
	- UBL-UnspecializedDatatypes-1.0.xsd
	- all (?) codelists
	
	In UBL-CoreComponentParameters-1.0.xsd is specified that the element

	Component must contain at minimum the elements ComponentType, 
	DictionaryEntryName an Definition. This is not correctly implemented
in the 
	schemes I mentioned before.
	
	 
	Best regards
	 
	Christine Spietz
	 
		
	Dipl.-Inf (FH)
	Fachhochschule Bingen
	Kompetenzzentrum für Innovative Informationssysteme
	Berlinstr. 109
	55411 Bingen
	 
	Tel: +49 (0)6721 409 200
	Fax: +49 (0)6721/409-158
	 
	Internet: www.fh-bingen.de
	email: spietz@fh-bingen.de
	________________________________


	No virus found in this incoming message.
	Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
	Version: 7.0.344 / Virus Database: 267.11.14/128 - Release Date:
10/10/2005
	
	  


-- 
regards
tim mcgrath
phone: +618 93352228  
postal: po box 1289   fremantle    western australia 6160

DOCUMENT ENGINEERING: Analyzing and Designing Documents for Business
Informatics and Web Services
http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?sid=632C40AB-4E94-4930-A94E
-22FF8CA5641F&ttype=2&tid=10476