Subject: Re: [ubl] UBP 1.0 separate from UBL 1.0 SBS ?
[email@example.com:] There may be a problem with the progress of the UBP directly to ballot as candidate committee specification in that it only underwent the second UBL-1.0-SBS public review (15 days) and has not had a review as a standalone draft. Right. It will have to start over (TC balloting and then 60-day review). | If it does need to complete a 50 day review to be allowed to | progress to committee specification ballot, how about we package | it together with the UBP 2.0 which is at the stage of waiting for | a vote to become a committee draft and public review | draft. Perhaps the two would then be called UBP 1.0 and be | packaged as one set of ebXML artifacts covering both UBL 1.0 and | UBL 2. OK with me. But note that if the UBP part is removed from 1.0 SBS, it will have to start over again, too. Jon