[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ubl] UBP 1.0 separate from UBL 1.0 SBS ?
OK. Then I'd prefer to keep it as it is. Thanks Jon for clarification. All the best Steve On 09/03/06, jon.bosak@sun.com <jon.bosak@sun.com> wrote: > [stephengreenubl@gmail.com:] > > There may be a problem with the progress of the UBP directly to > ballot as candidate committee specification in that it only > underwent the second UBL-1.0-SBS public review (15 days) and has > not had a review as a standalone draft. > > Right. It will have to start over (TC balloting and then 60-day > review). > > | If it does need to complete a 50 day review to be allowed to > | progress to committee specification ballot, how about we package > | it together with the UBP 2.0 which is at the stage of waiting for > | a vote to become a committee draft and public review > | draft. Perhaps the two would then be called UBP 1.0 and be > | packaged as one set of ebXML artifacts covering both UBL 1.0 and > | UBL 2. > > OK with me. But note that if the UBP part is removed from 1.0 > SBS, it will have to start over again, too. > > Jon > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS > at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]