[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Formal public comment: Berg
We are in receipt of the following public comment, which bears directly on our discussion of extension mechanisms. I will add this to the issues list. http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/200603/msg00051.html Jon ================================================================== Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:55:33 +0000 From: firstname.lastname@example.org Subject: [ubl-comment] Public Comment To: email@example.com Comment from: firstname.lastname@example.org Name: Are Berg Title: Senior Advisor Organization: EdiSys AS (on behalf of the Northern European Subset Group) Regarding Specification: UBL 2.0 To cover the requirements of different business sectors, we need the possibility to add extension to UBL-messages on both header and details level. These extensions will contain additional business-related information, and together with the relevant UBL-specification they will define the implementation of a particular message to be used in a specific line of business.