Formal public comment: Berg

[jon.bosak@sun.com]

We are in receipt of the following public comment, which bears
directly on our discussion of extension mechanisms.  I will add
this to the issues list.

   http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ubl-comment/200603/msg00051.html

Jon

==================================================================

Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:55:33 +0000
From: comment-form@oasis-open.org
Subject: [ubl-comment] Public Comment
To: ubl-comment@lists.oasis-open.org

Comment from: are.berg@edisys.no

Name: Are Berg
Title: Senior Advisor
Organization: EdiSys AS (on behalf of the Northern European Subset Group)
Regarding Specification: UBL 2.0
To cover the requirements of different business sectors, we need
the possibility to add extension to UBL-messages on both header
and details level. These extensions will contain additional
business-related information, and together with the relevant
UBL-specification they will define the implementation of a
particular message to be used in a specific line of business.