RE: [ubl] More NDR Questions

[Grimley Michael J NPRI <GrimleyMJ@Npt.NUWC.Navy.Mil>]

 

> In the NDR there is no documentation item that reports the ObjectClassQualifier of an ASBIE. Apparently an error.

 

Although I agree that this would be useful information (and have no objection to adding it), is this information requested/required within the CCTS?

 

> Due the use of the UDT from ATG2 1.0 there is an inconsistency between the rule for abbreviation and that UDT schema. According to the rule the type has to be named "IDType", the schema says "IdentifierType".

Yes indeed. This is because ATG2 does not have the 'restrictive' acronym rules we have. We need to capture that in the section where we explain our adoption of their UDT.

 

 

>  The is no rule for removing redundancies in names for BBIEs. So you will find a lot of things like "IDIDType" and so on. 

 

How about adding "Redundant words in the representation term, property term or its qualifiers MUST be removed."

 

---

From: Sylvia Webb [mailto:swebb@gefeg.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 07 June 2006 0916
To: ubl@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ubl] More NDR Questions

All,

 

GEFEG has completed a pre-beta release of the next version of GEFEG.FX. This new release includes support for UBL 2.0.  In completing development, we have the following additional NDR questions:

 

1. Schema: Core Component Parameters

------------------------------------

This schema is no longer imported, only the namespace is declared. But we still use the structure for documentation described in this schema.

We think it would be a good idea to list the documentation items in a plain structure without ccts:component and ccts:instance and to remove the CCP schema.

2. ccts:UsageRule

------------------------

How to fill the value?

3. Documentation for ASBIE

--------------------------

In the NDR there is no documentation item that reports the ObjectClassQualifier of an ASBIE. Apparently an error.

 

4. Identifier Type

------------------

Due the use of the UDT from ATG2 1.0 there is an inconsistency between the rule for abbreviation and that UDT schema. According to the rule the type has to be named "IDType", the schema says "IdentifierType".

5. Redundancy Rules

-------------------

The is no rule for removing redundancies in names for BBIEs. So you will find a lot of things like "IDIDType" and so on. 

How

 

Can we add these items to the agenda for today's call?

Regards

Sylvia