[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: SV: [ubl] IIDs and IDIDs
not sure what action list you have because mine (the one attched) has
no action required for ISS-29.|
I do agree that we shouldn't be calling it CustomizeID (don't know where that came from) ISS-30 clearly states "CustomizationID".
Peter Borresen wrote:
Hi Tim I have receive request from Jon that do not match with the resolved actionlist for PRD3. - Change all SubsetID to CustomizeID (It is written CustomizationID in the actionList) - Change the cardinallity for UBLVersionID to 0..1 (There was an action to change this to 1) Can you provide me with an updated issue/action list for PRD3? /Peter -----Oprindelig meddelelse----- Fra: Tim McGrath [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org] Sendt: 6. september 2006 01:20 Til: email@example.com Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org Emne: Re: [ubl] IIDs and IDIDs my understanding is that we use the abbreviation in all places, including the DEN. we do this with other abbreviations such as CV2 and UNDG so we should do the same with UUID and URI. that is why the spreadsheets have them that way. email@example.com wrote:- The form that should be used for the DENs of information items relating to UUIDs and URIs is a matter for CCTS experts to decide. But the form that should be used in UBL names is not in question. Questions that are in order at this point: - Are the DENs used for items relating to UUIDs and URIs formed correctly? - If not, what is their proper form? For we shall use this form when revising the spreadsheets.
-- regards tim mcgrath phone: +618 93352228 postal: po box 1289 fremantle western australia 6160 web: http://www.portcomm.com.au/tmcgrath