OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ubl message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]

Subject: [OASIS Issue Tracker] (UBL-88) Evidence Confidentiality Level

    [ https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-88?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=65849#comment-65849 ] 

Enric Torregrosa commented on UBL-88:

MS decided that the code "Secret" does not make sense at all: "secret" would prevent from keeping the information in the procurement procedure case (file) and therefore could not be preserved or even transferred between authorities. And in the end, the EO needs to send the information to be evaluated by one or more roles. 

Only "confidential" and "public" would make sense.

> Evidence Confidentiality Level
> ------------------------------
>                 Key: UBL-88
>                 URL: https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/UBL-88
>             Project: OASIS Universal Business Language (UBL) TC
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Documents and business objects
>            Reporter: Ken Holman
>            Assignee: Ole Madsen
>            Priority: Minor
> Evidence	A "Confidentiality Level" code should be added; Default Proposed Business Rule: if the Criterion is indicated as confidential the Evidence should become confidential, too,  even if it's confidentiality code is "Public". If the Criterion is not confidential the Evidence should be treated according to the confidentiality level (1) Secret, 2) Confidential, 3) Public)	ESPDResponse	65	Proposal: Let's add a ConfidentialityLevelTypeCode with three possible values (to be discussed) "Secret", "Confidential", and "Public".

This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]