[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [uddi-spec] ebXML Registry / UDDI Convergence
Claus, This would be a good first step. It seems as though most people who've replied are for this idea of convergence in principle, let's see where this all leads. Luc, Tom -- Is this okay? -Matt On Thursday, September 26, 2002, at 11:57 PM, Von Riegen, Claus wrote: > Matthew, > > Personally, I would appreciate a convergence. However, it is unlikely > that we can change UDDI's basic characteristics in terms of its data > structures, APIs, intra- and inter-registry communication and security > model. > > What about putting this item on the agenda for our next conference > call in order to find out how many TC members would be willing to > spend some time on investigating the amount of overlap and possible > convergence paths? > > Best regards, > Claus von Riegen, SAP > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew MacKenzie [mailto:matt@xmlglobal.com] > Sent: Freitag, 27. September 2002 01:24 > To: uddi-spec@lists.oasis-open.org > Cc: regrep@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: [uddi-spec] ebXML Registry / UDDI Convergence > > > Group, > > I know that this is a contentious issue, but I would like to get a > feeling of where everyone stands with regard to the idea of > interleaving these two standards into one single registry standard. > What would be the best way to do this? Should it be done? > > Regards, > > Matthew MacKenzie > VP, Chief Software Architect > XML Global Technologies, Inc. > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription > manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC