Re: [PATCH 1/1] Fix reserved Feature bits numbering

[Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>]

On 8/10/2021 9:44 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 01 2021, Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
> > This should have been updated during VIRTIO_F_NOTIFICATION_DATA and
> > VIRTIO_F_NOTIF_CONFIG_DATA standartization.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Max Gurtovoy <mgurtovoy@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >   content.tex | 4 ++--
> >   1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/content.tex b/content.tex
> > index 5c70a3c..e9a32fa 100644
> > --- a/content.tex
> > +++ b/content.tex
> > @@ -99,10 +99,10 @@ \section{Feature Bits}\label{sec:Basic Facilities of a Virtio Device / Feature B
> >   \begin{description}
> >   \item[0 to 23] Feature bits for the specific device type
> >   
> > -\item[24 to 37] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
> > +\item[24 to 39] Feature bits reserved for extensions to the queue and
> >     feature negotiation mechanisms
> I'm wondering whether we should do s/reserved/used/ here?

I'm just fixing a bug here. You can take this patch and create another 
one with the above suggestion on top.

I'm ok with your suggestion.

> >   
> > -\item[38 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions.
> > +\item[40 and above] Feature bits reserved for future extensions.
> >   \end{description}
> >   
> >   \begin{note}