Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] virtio-vsock: SOCK_SEQPACKET description

[Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jan 13 2022, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:

> On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:34:20PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
>>> Otherwise maybe we should write in the spec that if F_SEQPACKET is set
>>> this means that stream is supported even if F_STREAM is not set.
>>
>>Yes, if that works, it would probably be the less ugly option.
>
> Okay, let's go for F_STREAM (even Michael's comment seems to agree with 
> that).
>
> Do you think we need to write this implication into the specification, 
> or do we leave it to the implementation to solve this transient problem?

I would add something like "if F_SEQPACKET has been negotiated, the
[device|driver] MUST act as if F_STREAM has also been negotiated".