Re: [virtio-comment] Re: [PATCH v11 0/3] virtio-vsock: SOCK_SEQPACKET description

[Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>]

On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 03:06:54PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 13 2022, Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 13, 2022 at 12:34:20PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > Otherwise maybe we should write in the spec that if F_SEQPACKET is set
> > > > this means that stream is supported even if F_STREAM is not set.
> > >
> > > Yes, if that works, it would probably be the less ugly option.
> >
> > Okay, let's go for F_STREAM (even Michael's comment seems to agree with
> > that).
> >
> > Do you think we need to write this implication into the specification,
> > or do we leave it to the implementation to solve this transient problem?
>
> I would add something like "if F_SEQPACKET has been negotiated, the
> [device|driver] MUST act as if F_STREAM has also been negotiated".

Ack, I'll send v12 with this change.

Thanks,
Stefano