[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [PATCH 08/11] transport-pci: Introduce virtio extended capability
> From: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> > Sent: Monday, April 10, 2023 3:49 PM > Attribution is nice but Signed-off-by is not that. Then what is Signed-off-by for virtio spec? Can it be same definition as what Linux kernel and many other projects use like [1]? [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html?highlight=signed%20off > And fundamentally people go read the PDF where the Signed-off-by does not > appear at all no one pokes at git history. When people read PDF, they do not care about the sign-off. Signed-off-by is not for that. > Let's just do: > > Thanks-to: name <email> > Why to now learn a new term? Why terminology of [1] is not enough like AQ status codes? :) > if you want attribution. > > will be helpful to fill in the thanks section in the spec and does not mention > signatures.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]