Re: [virtio-dev] Memory sharing device

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 07:24:20AM -0800, Frank Yang wrote:
> IPC though, seems like it would add quite some overhead,
> unless there's some generally accepted portable way to run via shared memory
> that doesn't also involve busy waiting in a way that burns up the CPU?

Let's just say designing host/guest APIs around specific OS limitations
doesn't sound like a good direction either.

Try talking to Chrome guys, I hear they are using process per plugin for
security too? What do they do for portability?

-- 
MST