Re: [PATCH] latexify document more.

[Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>]

On Tue, 03 Dec 2013 10:45:05 +1030
Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com> wrote:

> Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> writes:
> > On Mon, 02 Dec 2013 16:56:16 +1030
> > Rusty Russell <rusty@au1.ibm.com> wrote:

> >> @@ -1970,11 +1984,11 @@ and align the alignment.
> >>  The virtqueue is physically contiguous, with padded added to make the
> >>  used ring meet the align value:
> >>  
> >> -\begin{verbatim}
> >> -+-------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+
> >> -| Descriptor Table  |   Available Ring     (padding)    | Used Ring |
> >> -+-------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------+
> >> -\end{verbatim}
> >> +\begin{tabular}{|l|l|l|}
> >> +\hline
> >> +Descriptor Table & Available Ring (\ldots padding\ldots) & Used Ring \\
> >> +\hline
> >> +\end{tabular}
> >>  
> >>  The calculation for total size is as follows:
> >>  
> >
> > Just noted: This seems to be a duplicate paragraph, no? We already
> > described the layout earlier, no need to repeat it in the virtio-ccw
> > section.
> 
> Yes, we describe it once in the legacy section earlier.  The
> duplication is deliberate, so that each section stands alone, because
> we were originally going to put legacy in a separate document.  Even
> if we don't, making non-legacy depend on legacy feels wrong; I think
> this is the lesser evil?
> 
> But I don't really mind.  If you dislike it, please directly edit
> before meeting :)

On re-reading, I think I'll keep it in there.