[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [virtio] tc process: we need changebars?
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:37:59PM +0000, James Bottomley wrote: > On Tue, 2014-02-11 at 13:12 +0200, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > I recently looked at > > https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/tc-process > > and I have a question: > > > > The initial public review of a public review draft must take place for a > > minimum of 30 days, and any subsequent reviews must be held for a > > minimum of 15 days. Changes made to a committee draft after a review > > must be clearly identified in any subsequent review, and the subsequent > > review shall be limited in scope to changes made in the previous review. > > > > how are we going to identify changes to reviewers? > > we probably can use changebar and then \cbstart / \cbend manually. > > Tried latexdiff withou tmuch success. > > Other ideas? > > This is all the ctan change log and doc management projects: > > http://www.ctan.org/topic/doc-mgmt > > I'm afraid the internet does think latexdiff to be the best one > though ... perhaps we should give it another try? Well latexdiff is merely an automated way to add markup. We still need to fix \cbstart / \cbend to work with xetex ... > The package I used for my thesis (~20 years ago) isn't even available > anymore, so I'm afraid I have no current experience. > > James > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that > generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at: > https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]