Re: [virtio] virtio 1.0 errata

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 05:09:45PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:12:03 +0200
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > ok we have a somewhat major issue with
> > incorrect ring size listed in the table:
> > VIRTIO-120
> > 
> > this seems to warrant errata release,
> > and we can fix the ugly ldots: VIRTIO-115
> 
> I agree that we want an errata release for these.
> 
> > 
> > anything else that's small and urgent enough that it can and should go
> > in errata?
> 
> The (mostly cosmetic) section alignment for virtio-block (VIRTIO-125) I
> just posted is certainly small, but I don't think I'd classify it as
> urgent.

I think it's a reasonable thing to do for errata too.

One other thing is rearranging the tree so we can
do errata on branches in parallel with new features
on trunk.

I don't think we need to vote on that, but I will start
a mail thread to make sure no one objects.


> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that 
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php