Re: [virtio] voting and issue tracking for virtio 1.0cs03/1.1

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 08:55:10AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 4 Feb 2015 00:12:57 +0100
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2015 at 03:23:20PM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > On Tue, 3 Feb 2015 12:52:23 +0200
> > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > 
> > > > On Fri, Jan 23, 2015 at 11:21:28AM +0100, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > > > > On Thu, 22 Jan 2015 23:44:41 +0200
> > > > > "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > We will also need some process to periodically approve
> > > > > > post-factum formatting, typo fixes and similar simple changes.
> > > > > > We don't want issue tracking for these I think.
> > > > > > I'll probably put these up for voting about once
> > > > > > a month or so, we'll see.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Should we perhaps have an issue that is collecting all those minor
> > > > > fixes and is simply opened after month?
> > > > > 
> > > > > > All this likely will mean there will be a bunch of ballots
> > > > > > running on the TC at all times.
> > > > > > If you can't vote, pls remember to mark up your status
> > > > > > as leave of absence.
> > > > > 
> > > > > After having searched on the oasis site for a while: Remind me how one
> > > > > does so?
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Cornelia, could you please start with CCW patches you posted so we can
> > > > > > try this out, see how well it works?
> > > > > 
> > > > > That would be 116-119 and 129, right? I can give it a try later.
> > > > 
> > > > I can do the technicalies if it's hard for you, but
> > > > I need to know which are bugfixes intended for 1.0-cs03 and
> > > > which are features for 1.1 only.
> > > 
> > > OK, changed 116/118/119/127. Don't remember the reporter though (ISTR
> > > it was me).
> > 
> > I think so. Pls fill it.
> 
> Done.
> 
> > Do you think 116 is non material?
> 
> I'm not 100% sure it would qualify as such.  I think 118 is, though.
> 
> > 
> > 
> > > 117 is not ready yet (no proposed change). I think we also
> > > need to handle 125, don't we?
> > 
> > why not, that's easy.
> 
> Done. I think this one is non-material as well.


I think at this point there are many changes already,
let's just plan a public review period for cs03.

-- 
MST