Re: [virtio] Re: Editorial comments on VIRTIO v1.2 csd01

["Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>]

On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 02:40:25PM +0200, Halil Pasic wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 10:07:12 +0200
> Cornelia Huck <cohuck@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, May 10 2022, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 04:40:53PM -0400, Paul Knight wrote:  
> > >> Hi all,
> > >> 
> > >> These comments are intended for the TC Editors, although I'm sending it to the
> > >> TC's email list for future reference.
> > >> 
> > >> In running a link check, I noted several issues, none significant for this
> > >> initial public review publication:
> > >> - broken link in Normative references:
> > >> -- [S390 Common I/O] ESA/390 Common I/O-Device and Self-Description, IBM
> > >> Publication SA22-7204,
> > >> http://publibfp.dhe.ibm.com/cgi-bin/bookmgr/BOOKS/dz9ar501/CCONTENTS, and any
> > >> future revisions
> > >> (This link is currently broken, and I could not find any alternative source for
> > >> this document. - please rewrite the reference to indicate document is no longer
> > >> available at this link. You may also consider whether the solitary citation at
> > >> 4.3.1.3 is still needed.)
> > >> This broken link is not a blocking issue for a Committee specification Draft,
> > >> but it will not be allowed for a Committee Specification.  
> > >
> > > OK I addressed the below but not the above. Cornelia, Halil, I could use
> > > some help here.  
> > 
> > I think the content of this document is still generally relevant, but
> > I don't know where it (or an update) can be found nowadays... Halil, did
> > you have any luck locating a public link?
> > 
> 
> Yes, a link to a publication in a BOOKMGR format.
> https://www.ibm.com/resources/publications/OutputPubsDetails?PubID=SA22720401
> 
> Unfortunately I failed at getting the corresponding people to provide
> something more usable (e.g. a PDF).
> 
> I believe, the best we can do is use this link. Maybe if more people
> start complaining about the format provided...
> 
> Regards,
> Halil

Should it still say SA22-7204 or should it say SA22-7204-01?

-- 
MST