Re: Is the default process correctly described?

[Jon Bosak <bosak@boethius.eng.sun.com>]

It looks like we have consensus that I've got the default process more
or less right.  Let's work on this in the background to be clear on
the details.

[Terry Allen:]

| I'm happy to agree on "an" interpretation, in particular, Jon's, once
| we clarify a few points.  For example, in Section 7, can the committee
| (as well as the Board) set the frequency of meetings?  Jon and I get
| different results performing the expansion.

The original article 3 section 7 reads

   Section 7. Regular Meetings

      Regular meetings of Directors, shall be held at a minimum
      of four (4) times per calendar year.

Performing the expansion called for in art. 5 sect. 3 and adding the
board (on which we seem to be agreed) gave me this:

      Regular meetings of the committee shall be held at a
      minimum of four (4) times per calendar year or as the Board
      of Directors shall provide.

I didn't mean to limit the right of the committee to schedule
meetings.  I now think that a more accurate expansion would be

      Regular meetings of the committee shall be held at a
      minimum of four (4) times per calendar year and at such
      additional times as the committee may determine or as the
      Board of Directors may provide.

(Reminder: I'm not attempting to set policy here, just to understand
the process we're given to start with.)

There may be other nuances here that I'm not digging deeply enough
into Robert's to find.

What other aspects of my interpretation of the default process are in
question?

Jon