Re: Fast track, slow track

[Jon Bosak <bosak@boethius.eng.sun.com>]

Oh yeah, I forgot this one:

      070. To what extent can a TC revise its requirements list?

And in a few minutes I will also be sending out the following:

      010. Voting membership in a committee

           011. Why individuals?

           012. Criteria for voting membership

So our current revised issues list looks like this (the asterisks
indicate the issues on which I have already posted or am about to post
discussion starters):

      000. Need for a new set of procedures

*          001. Why Robert's won't work

*          002. Why IETF rules won't work, either

*     010. Voting membership in a committee

*          011. Why individuals?

*          012. Criteria for voting membership

      020. Limiting debate

          [021. Rules of discourse in general]

           025. Previous Question

      030. Notification

      040. Public vs. private

      050. Standing committees

           055. Maintenance commmittees

      060. Other committees

           061. Joint subcommittees
           062. Charter committees
           063. Industry harmonization committees
           064. Coordination committees
           065. Translation committees

      070. To what extent can a TC revise its requirements list?

      080. Can we call the last step a "standard"?

      090. Shall we require agendas in advance of committee meetings?