RE: [ws-caf-editors] context model

[Mark Little <Mark.Little@arjuna.com>]

Yes, I've seen that. OK, let's keep that in mind, though I'm not sure it's 
something for the first round of model clarifications. However, since I wasn't 
at the f2f, maybe it is?

Mark.

>===== Original Message From Greg Pavlik <greg.pavlik@oracle.com> =====
>as a reference:
>http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-resource/ws-modelingresource
s.pdf;
>
>Greg Pavlik wrote:
>
>> ah, that's a good question. When I have more time to think about it,
>> I'll give you my real answer. The short, easy answer that we might get
>> the most mileage out of anyway is the "stateful resource with a
>> lifecycle" as modeled by WS-RF.
>>
>> Mark Little wrote:
>>
>>>What do you mean by "resource"?
>>>
>>>Mark.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>===== Original Message From Greg Pavlik <greg.pavlik@oracle.com> =====
>>>Also, note that this takes a stab at the highest level of the stack, so
>>>to speak, in the Context spec; or, perhaps another way to put it: it
>>>describes the full integration of all the components in the spec. One
>>>other thing we don't talk about is the implied relationship between
>>>resources and contexts. Since this has been an underlying theme in many
>>>discussions we've had over the last months, we might want to consider
>>>expanding the text to call this out explicitly in a second pass.
>>>
>>>Martin Chapman wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>what is the relationship between activity identifier and context? the
>>>>text implies a realtionship yet its not on the diagram. also I sugest
>>>>that rather having a note saying that activities can be nested, that
>>>>there is an self refernceing association on  activity.
>>>>
>>>>Martin.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>>From: Mark Little [mailto:Mark.Little@arjuna.com]
>>>>>Sent: 09 March 2004 22:16
>>>>>To: ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
>>>>>Cc: mark.little@arjuna.com
>>>>>Subject: [ws-caf-editors] context model
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Here's the context model we seem to have agreement on so far.
>>>>>If you can take
>>>>>a quick look and let me know of anything that you think needs
>>>>>qualifying, I'll
>>>>>send it to the main group. I want to then follow up with
>>>>>email explaining the
>>>>>diagram (basically the text we've already got). From there we
>>>>>can persue some
>>>>>of the other issues (such as removing status types, context
>>>>>as one block in
>>>>>the SOAP header or one entry per ALS, ...)
>>>>>
>>>>>Mark.
>>>>>
>>>>>----
>>>>>Mark Little,
>>>>>Chief Architect, Transactions,
>>>>>Arjuna Technologies Ltd.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>www.arjuna.com
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>