Re: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context

[Greg Pavlik <greg.pavlik@oracle.com>]

Is it correct to say that Eric holds the change token against Mark's 
latest? After Eric's changes come in today, how do we proceed to a TC 
release?

Greg

Greg Pavlik wrote:

> If the activity is the execution, then no, we don't manage it. On the 
> other hand, what is this context thingy before we start to do any 
> operations?
>
> Newcomer, Eric wrote:
>
>> I had started making a few changes also.  Perhaps the best thing for 
>> me to do is start over with this version.
>>
>> Everything I spotted was editorial except for one thing, which was a 
>> statement that we were managing activities.  I have seen this also in 
>> Microsoft material.  The difficulty is that we are calling activity 
>> an abstract notion for which we are managing context.  I do not think 
>> we create or manage the activity itself, do we?
>>
>> I'll get the rest input as soon as I can.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Mark Little [mailto:mark.little@arjuna.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 14, 2004 7:27 AM
>> To: Greg Pavlik; ws-caf-editors
>> Subject: Re: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
>>
>>
>> Comments in line. I accepted all of the changes and then made some more.
>>
>> Mark.
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> From: "Greg Pavlik" <greg.pavlik@oracle.com>
>> To: "ws-caf-editors" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
>> Sent: Friday, June 11, 2004 10:36 PM
>> Subject: [ws-caf-editors] Latest (final?) WS-Context
>>
>>
>>  
>>
>>> Gentlemen,
>>>
>>> This is the latest revision for the proposed committee draft. I urge 
>>> you
>>> to read it carefully with the change bars turned off; please be
>>> especially diligent in looking for errors.
>>>
>>> Mark, WSDL+Schema on the way for packaging things up for the TC to 
>>> review.
>>>
>>> We're getting close. Thanks to everyone for their hard work.
>>>
>>> Greg
>>>   
>>>
>>  
>>
>