Re: [ws-caf-editors] FW: Public Comment for Ws-Context

["Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com>]

OK, so I've checked and the only difference between the template we were
using and the new one is the addition of the OASIS badge. There is no
copyright statement or anything else I can see. Is it possible to get a list
of things that need adding, or should we just go with adding the badge?

Also, I assume this will have to be version 0.8?

Mark.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Chapman" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
To: "'ws-caf editors'" <ws-caf-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, October 19, 2004 3:40 PM
Subject: [ws-caf-editors] FW: Public Comment for Ws-Context


>
> we must get the Context Draft updated to use the OASIS template before
> we can go to review:
> http://www.oasis-open.org/spectools/index.php
>
> who is up for such a wonderful job?
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
> Sent: 19 October 2004 15:35
> To: Martin Chapman
> Cc: 'James Bryce Clark'; Eric.Newcomer@iona.com
> Subject: Re: Public Comment for Ws-Context
>
>
> Yes, all CDs must use the OASIS templates.
>
> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#committee_draft
> "The Committee Draft must use the OASIS-approved document templates and
> naming, and must include the OASIS copyright."
>
> -Karl
>
>
>
> Martin Chapman wrote:
> > is it compulsory to use the OASIS doc template, as just realised our
> > approved draft doesn’t use it!
> >
> > Martin.
> >
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Karl F. Best [mailto:karl.best@oasis-open.org]
> >>Sent: 19 October 2004 14:46
> >>To: martin.chapman@oracle.com
> >>Cc: James Bryce Clark; Eric.Newcomer@iona.com
> >>Subject: Re: Public Comment for Ws-Context
> >>
> >>
> >>Martin:
> >>
> >>For a review to qualify as the public review required by the
> >>TC Process
> >>it must be announced by me to the members, etc. Please see the section
>
> >>"Public Review" at
> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/process.php#committee_draft
> >>
> >>You'll need to provide me with the publicly-viewable URL for the spec,
> >>and the start/end dates of the review. Then I'll get the announcement
> >>out right away.
> >>
> >>See, for example,
> >>http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/tc-announce/200410/msg00000.html
> >>
> >>-Karl
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>James Bryce Clark wrote:
> >>
> >>>    Martin & Eric:  Thank you.  Congratulations for reaching this
> >>>stage.  We normally achieve a public review of a TC draft by
> >>
> >>having it
> >>
> >>>formally announced to the public review over our channels,
> >>
> >>including to
> >>
> >>>the members-announce lists.  I am forwarding this to Karl
> >>
> >>for action.  I
> >>
> >>>expect he will need, at least, a pointer to the specific uploaded
> >>>version that has been approved for review.  JBC
> >>>
> >>>At 05:07 PM 10/18/2004, Martin Chapman wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>jamie,
> >>>>at out last f2f, the ws-caf tc voted in favor of putting the
> >>>>ws-context v.7 cd out for public comment. do you know if there is a
> >>>>comment email setup for the caf group so that we can include this in
>
> >>>>the document. is there anything else we need to know that’s not
> >>>>already
> >>>
> >>in the tc
> >>
> >>>>process?
> >>>>
> >>>>cheers,
> >>>>   martin.
> >>>>_________________________________________________________________
> >>>>martin chapman
> >>>>consulting member of technical staff
> >>>>oracle
> >>>>p: +353 87 687 6654
> >>>>e: martin.chapman@oracle.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>