[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan
OK, but I still think we need to decide exactly what we're going to produce, if anything. Mark. ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Fuller" <jfuller@wernervas.com> To: "Mark Little" <mark.little@arjuna.com> Cc: <ws-caf-implement-chair@lists.oasis-open.org>; <ws-caf-implement@lists.oasis-open.org>; "malik saheb" <malik.saheb@arjuna.com>; <krishna@inventicasystems.com> Sent: Wednesday, December 17, 2003 12:37 PM Subject: Re: [ws-caf-implement] WS-CAF Implementation Plan > I guess as my suggestion goes, I was imagining someone like Malik could > set up a sourceforge project > (and sourceforge.net would be the host) sort of like I did at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/easywsrm/ > http://sourceforge.net/projects/easyasap/ > and Jeffrey Ricker did at > http://sourceforge.net/projects/axisasap/ > and grant developers administrative permissions. > > It's free, public, you can move whatever you want into the file > releases if you have administrative rights, etc. So I could move in > C++ for that package, others could move in their Java and we could also > put our working documents out there. It does support CVS, but you > don't need to use it. > > *** > > Another alternative I suppose would be a yahoo group like boost C++ > uses for its files at > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/boost/files/ > This would make the work public just to those in the group. > > > On Dec 17, 2003, at 2:25 AM, Mark Little wrote: > > > It's worth considering, but who'd host it? > > > > Also, are we actually going to provide a single demo implementation (or > > implementations depending on the coding language) or just a > > model/definition > > that each individual member can code against? There are pros and cons > > of > > both approaches. > >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]