Re: [ws-caf] CAF port-type pairs

[Greg Pavlik <greg.pavlik@oracle.com>]

Peter. Thank you. I think this will be very useful in several respects: 
not only does it add clarity but (as we discussed) it helps to provide 
normative rules for the callback pattern a manner that is neutral with 
respect to the underlying addressing scheme.

Furniss, Peter wrote:

>At the conf-call after New Orleans or on the phone into New Orleans, I
>offered to provide a draft of a table showing the matching between the
>requests sent by each side of the various ws-caf protocols, derived from
>some stuff I'd done internally when the documents first came out. I then
>forgot about it, apologies, but see that the editor's group have got to
>about that point, so here it is. Submitted under OASIS IPR rules.
> 
>As explained in it, it has not been editted to reflect the recent
>content changes, and the tables ought to include the fault replies.
> 
>By the way, all accessible editions of WS-TXM that I've found have a
>corrupt diagram for TXM BP Completion.
> 
>Peter
> 
>------------------------------------------
>Peter Furniss
>Chief Scientist, Choreology Ltd
>web: http://www.choreology.com <http://www.choreology.com/> 
>email: peter.furniss@choreology.com
>phone: +44 870 739 0066
>mobile: +44 7951 536168
>
> 
>
>  
>