OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-calendar message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-calendar] Is there a difference?


That is my sense, Bill, but I am trying to make sure.

 

For this conversation, assume UTC, leaving out DST and related issues. I’m looking for whether there should be a deeper meaning when applied to services. For people, if a CalConnect meeting starts at 12:00 and goes for an hour, one could argue that since they always start at 12:05, this means that it is scheduled until 1:05….

 

For services, I am interested in what is the required / expected state of the service at 3:01.

 

Let’s say I schedule a room for 78 degrees between 2-3.

Let’s say I schedule the same room for 72 degrees between 3-4.

 

Let’s say that I know it takes 10 minutes to go between the temperatures.

 

If the first schedule is in response to DR for Energy, then I am committed to not setting the thermostat  *until* 3:00

If the second schedule is in response to CEO arriving for a meeting, then I am committed to getting the room temperature down *by* 3:00

 

 

 


"If something is not worth doing, it`s not worth doing well" - Peter Drucker


Toby Considine
TC9, Inc

OASIS Technical Advisory Board
TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop

U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee

  

Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com
Phone: (919)619-2104

http://www.tcnine.com/
blog: www.NewDaedalus.com

 

 

From: William Cox [mailto:wtcox@CoxSoftwareArchitects.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2010 10:20 AM
To: Toby.Considine@gmail.com
Cc: ws-calendar@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-calendar] Is there a difference?

 

I think that "support" and "the profile says use this" are two different things.

I would suggest listing only A and B, and preferably only one (profiling as well as extending) so there's a consistent representation.

I see no real difference between A and B.

Allowing the higher expessivity  is fine for human calendars as the interpretation is done by calendar software. For the energy/building uses, a single canonical representation is appropriate.

Thanks!

bill

On 6/10/10 9:50 AM, Toby Considine wrote:

What’s the difference in *actions*, and in *performance* between

 

Do X beginning at 2:00 for an hour duration

Do X beginning at 2:00 for and ending at 3:00

Do X for an hour ending at 3:00

 

All are possible using the VTODO data structure.

One (C) is not allowed if I understand correctly

 

Within any interaction, it would be simpler, cleaner to allow only (A) or (B)

Do we need to allow both?

 

Does B have a finite stop and A does not?

Why would we support both?

 

tc


“It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it” -- Upton Sinclair.


Toby Considine
TC9, Inc

OASIS Technical Advisory Board
TC Chair: oBIX & WS-Calendar

TC Editor: EMIX, EnergyInterop

U.S. National Inst. of Standards and Tech. Smart Grid Architecture Committee

  

Email: Toby.Considine@gmail.com
Phone: (919)619-2104

http://www.tcnine.com/
blog: www.NewDaedalus.com

 

 



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]