RE: [ws-rx-comment] Comments on WS-RM CD04

[Marc Goodner <mgoodner@microsoft.com>]

Thank you for your comments. The TC divided them into PR issues as described below. I will let you know as each is resolved.

The PR issue list for the TC can be found here:
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/pr/Issues.xml

Regards,
Marc Goodner

-----Original Message-----
From: YASHIRO, Sadao [mailto:sada@jp.fujitsu.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 19, 2006 10:03 PM
To: ws-rx-comment@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-comment] Comments on WS-RM CD04

Dear WS-RX TC members,
Here are my comments on WS-ReliableMessaging Committee Draft 04.

PR Issue 18
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/pr/Issues.xml#i018
---
1. Section 3.2 (P. 10)
This section describes piggy-back messages, but does not mention receivable
message combinations. So, which message combinations can be received could
be implementation-dependent.

I think it could indicate unavailable message combinations, such as:
- Combination of a Sequence message (user payload) and a Sequence Lifecycle
message (CrSq, ClSq, etc.)
- Combination of a SOAP Fault and other message.
---

PR Issue 19
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/pr/Issues.xml#i019
---
2. Section 3.8 (P. 19)
According to the specification, a receiver must return an Acknowledgement
when a message contains an AckRequested element, which requests an
Acknowledgement. However, it is not specified that a receiver must not
return an Acknowledgement when a message contains no AckRequested element.
So, I think the implementation should return an AckRequested element
whenever a user payload is received.
---

PR Issue 20
http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/pr/Issues.xml#i020
---
3. No description on guaranteed message ordering and duplication
elimination.
Neither did the previous version. Did the TC determine to set them out of
scope?
---

Regards,
Sadao Yashiro

=================================
Sadao Yashiro
Strategy & Technology Division,
Software Group,
Fujitsu Limited
=================================


This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the
OASIS Web Services Reliable Exchange (WS-RX) TC.

In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and
to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required
before posting.

Subscribe: ws-rx-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
Unsubscribe: ws-rx-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
List help: ws-rx-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org
List archive: http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/ws-rx-comment/
Feedback License: http://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf
List Guidelines: http://www.oasis-open.org/maillists/guidelines.php
Committee: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=ws-rx