[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: FW: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on the 7/28 conf-call
I had meant to post it to the editors list ... >-----Original Message----- >From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] >Sent: Tuesday, Jul 26, 2005 23:24 PM >To: wsrx >Subject: FW: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on >the 7/28 conf-call > > >I am thinking of scheduling one or more of the issues 14, 15, 16 and 17 >for discussion on the 7/28 call. Is there a consensus among the editors >about the resolution of these issues. Any suggestions regarding which >ones are easy targets and which ones require further deliberations by >the editors team? > >Basically, I am looking for simple issues for scheduling along >with some >of the core design issues and wanted to get a feel from you about which >ones are straightforward, etc. > >Thanks, >Sanjay > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com] >>Sent: Monday, Jul 25, 2005 13:04 PM >>To: Patil, Sanjay; ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: RE: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on >>the 7/28 conf-call >> >>Can we also discuss i014 Document names and i016 document >>identifiers to >>try to get some more of the editorial issues into he pending queue? >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com] >>Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 11:59 AM >>To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject: [ws-rx] Proposed list of issues for discussion on the 7/28 >>conf-call >> >> >>Here is a proposed list of issues for discussion on the 7/28 >conf-call. >> >>- Issue i013: Max message number in policy >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php >>/13697/Re >>liableMessagingIssues.xml#i013 >> >>- Issue (i018): Is an implementation supporting a smaller max message >>number valid? >> See the first issue in the email: >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archiv >>es/200507 >>/msg00193.html >> >>- Issue (i019): Sequence termination on Fault >> See the second issue in the email: >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/email/archiv >>es/200507 >>/msg00193.html >> >>I urge the originators of these issues to come prepared for describing >>on the conf-call the motivating requirements as well as the proposed >>resolution for the issues. >> >>The three issues (i006, i008 and i009) discussed on the last conf-call >>(7/21) are currently waiting for a clear statement of >requirements from >>their owners. Let us carry the discussion of these issues on >>the mailing >>list until their requirements are clearly hashed out. >> >>Thanks, >>Sanjay >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]