RE: [ws-rx-editors] cvs

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

I think the issue was that we didn't
know if there was any issue  :-)  When setting up the project
I had to choose a license - which one is the right one? No one knew for
sure.
So to play it safe we asked the oasis
people to set one up - this is really something they should have anyway.
And as Anish said, if it happens soon
then we should look to that one.
-Doug

"Gilbert Pilz" <Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com>

07/28/2005 12:35 PM

To	<ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [ws-rx-editors] cvs

I really don't understand the IPR-related objections
to using
SourceForge's CVS. Can someone explain this to me?

- g 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2005 9:18 AM
> To: Doug Davis
> Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] cvs
> 
> We decided on OpenOffice.
> 
> WRT to cvs, it really depends on how long the CVS setup is 
> going to take. For now I agree with you that just passing 
> things around is fine. 
> But if the CVS setup takes too long then we should consider 
> sourceforge. 
> Is it possible to make the files/versions visible to members 
> only in sourceforge?
> 
> -Anish
> --
> 
> Doug Davis wrote:
> > 
> > Since we don't have a firm decision yet from the oasis 
> admins (Sanjay 
> > says that they're hopeful a cvs will be setup soon) do we 
> want to use 
> > sourceforge, use the RX web page or just pass around the docs
thru 
> > email?  Since we don't have a lot of changes yet we could
> just decide 
> > to wait a bit longer.  I'm leaning towards just passing
'em 
> around for now.
> >  BTW - did we ever decide whether we were going to use Word
> or OpenOffice?
> > thanks,
> > -Doug
>