[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number?
Thanks Anish! I guess the options you pointed out are not bad and would certainly work for some one who is reviewing the spec more closely, perhaps from beginning to end! The question is - If some one wanted to search for all the changes to the specs due to a particular issue, what are his options? With MS Word, one solution is to "find issue#" since the find function visits both the main text as well as the comments. I am not suggesting that we must have a solution for every possible kind of spec reader. I am simply trying to understand what we can and can not do at the moment. I am fine if the issue # annotation is currently non-searchable. Thanks, Sanjay >-----Original Message----- >From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] >Sent: Monday, Sep 19, 2005 16:58 PM >To: Patil, Sanjay >Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org >Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number? > >Sanjay, > >OO Notes which are equivalent of MS Word comments can be viewed only >three different ways: >1) look at the PDF, (2) move your cursor over the tiny yellow >rectangle >(where the comment appears) in .sxw file, (3) print the doc >and specify >in the options that you want the Notes. > >The MS Word comment option where you can do a view->comments is not >available (AFAIK) in OO. > >-Anish >-- > > >Patil, Sanjay wrote: >> >> Not necessarily on each line, but a note with the issue # >for an added >> paragraph, etc, would be enough. For example, the paragraph >on lines 391 >> to 397 describes the new subelement >> /wsrm:SequenceAcknowledgement/wsrm:Final. It will very useful for a >> reviewer to see the annotation for this paragraph to say - >i019 and i028. >> >> I guess the technique you describe below might work but I am not an >> expert on OO as you can tell :-) Preferably, it should not >be required >> to hover the mouse on the text to see the notes and >something akin to MS >> Word comments is desirable. >> >> Thanks, >> Sanjay >> >> >--------------------------------------------------------------- >--------- >> *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] >> *Sent:* Monday, Sep 19, 2005 12:45 PM >> *To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org >> *Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number? >> >> >> Oh, you mean on each specific line that changed? I thought you >> meant in the 'revision history' section. >> Don't know if there's an easy way to mark each line with >the issue # >> w/o a lot of manual typing. >> Only thing I could think of would be to temporarily >change your user >> name to include the issue #, then the change record >would include it >> as part of the change ;-) >> Kind of a hack though. >> -Doug >> >> >> >> *"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>* >> >> 09/19/2005 03:38 PM >> >> >> To >> Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, ><ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> >> cc >> >> Subject >> RE: [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Ah! Then I must have missed the annotations/notes. >Could some one >> please educate me about how to read the notes in the OO doc. >> >> Thanks, >> Sanjay >> >> >--------------------------------------------------------------- >--------- >> *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com] * >> Sent:* Monday, Sep 19, 2005 12:33 PM* >> To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org* >> Subject:* Re: [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number? >> >> >> I did that on my changes, and I see Umit did that on >hers so I think >> we're ok. >> -Doug >> >> >> *"Patil, Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>* >> >> 09/19/2005 03:06 PM >> >> >> To >> <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org> >> cc >> >> Subject >> [ws-rx-editors] Annotation for issue number? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Would it make sense to add annotation with the issue >number whenever >> there are any changes made to the spec text. I think it >will make it >> easier for the TC members to understand where each >change is originating >> from. If a particular change is purely editorial, we >could say that in >> the annotation. >> >> In my experience with other TCs, such annotations are >quite useful >> especially when the drafts include changes for many issues. >> >> Thanks, >> Sanjay >> >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]