Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor nit

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

Just added the doc to the editor's doc
list - so while its not cvs at least a note should not be sent out to the
entire tc each time we make a minor edit.  I can live with this.
-Doug

Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>

09/19/2005 08:33 PM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject	Re: [ws-rx-editors] Minor nit

This exactly why we really really really need CVS,
now.
The reason I did not change it (although it was trivial to do so) was 
because I did not want to update the website for such a small change and
I did not want to prevent other editors from making a (different) change
to the document (write-after-write).

I guess, till we have a CVS we'll have to live with such an arrangement.
Sigh!

-Anish
--

Doug Davis wrote:
> 
> Already have a fix for this - just removed the extension from the
> filename.  I didn't update the file on the website 'cause I've
been 
> updating it too much today and was waiting for a more significant
change 
> :-)
> -Doug
> 
> 
> 
> *Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>*
> 
> 09/19/2005 07:44 PM
> 
>                  
> To
>                  "Patil,
Sanjay" <sanjay.patil@sap.com>
> cc
>                  ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject
>                  Re:
[ws-rx-editors] Minor nit
> 
> 
>                  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Can we add this as an Action Item in the WS-RX Editors SC?
> I don't have the permission (I assume, since I don't see the 'add
> Action' button) to do so. Can you add this or give me the right permissions?
> 
> This AI list can serve as our TODO list. Once we have enuf of these
> things, we can generate a new draft periodically OR roll it in with
> other substantial changes/issue resolution.
> 
> I can fix this, but don't want to generate too may draft that would
make
> it hard for everyone to track. Which reminds me: we really need the
CVS.
> IIRC, we were only going to wait for a few weeks for OASIS to get
its
> act together (and it hasn't). Else we were planning on using
> sourceforge. Not having CVS is very frustrating. What's the status
on
> resolving the IPR/legal issues (if any) wrt using sourceforge?
> 
> -Anish
> -- 
> 
> 
> Patil, Sanjay wrote:
>  > The footer note in the pdf document reads - wsrm-1.1-wd-03.sxw
>  >
>  > Thanks,
>  > Sanjay
>