[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Committee Draft issues
Cool, this did help. An up to date issue list will be posted shortly. I haven't handled the multiple target thing yet, one thing at a time... -----Original Message----- From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] Sent: Thursday, October 13, 2005 5:38 PM To: Marc Goodner Cc: Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Committee Draft issues Thx Marc! Yes, i013 is done. The email I sent was about the WSRM doc (i013 is for WSRM-Policy doc). For the policy doc: in addition to i013, i001 and i009 are done. Please note that I sent one correction to the email that you quoted. The correction was: proposed04 is now issue i039 which is also 'editor done'. FYI: all the closed issues that required action from the editors are in the 'Revision History' of both the WSRM and WSRMP docs. HTH. -Anish -- Marc Goodner wrote: > These should all be tagged correctly in the next update. I013 is done to > right? I'll note any more I se as I find 'em. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] > Sent: Friday, September 30, 2005 5:08 PM > To: Doug Davis > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org > Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] Committee Draft issues > > As you may have seen I checked in drafts to fix issues i017, i045 and > i046. For 17, I picked 200510 as the 'YYYYMM'. > > +1 to waiting to have a fix for i024. > > I think we are done wrt wsrm doc based on the issues that Paul sent. > Thanks Dug for doing the heavy lifting. > > Here is a summary (of the issues that Paul sent out) for the WSRM doc: > > 1) Closed issues that require no change to the doc -- > 3, 4, 12, 14, 18, 26 > > 2) Issues that do require action and should now be 'editors - done' -- > 5, 11, 15, 16, 17, 19, 27, 28, 20, 25, 29, 31, 33, 34, 39, 40 > > 3) New proposed issues -- > NewProposed01 (issue i036) closed with no action > Proposed04 (issue i036) done > Proposed05 (issue i040) done > Proposed11 (issue i045) done > Proposed12 (issue i046) done > > -Anish > -- > > Doug Davis wrote: > >>Editors, >> I think the only one left is: i024 - didn't do because I wanted the > > TC > >>to agree on Ashok's text first. >>and haven't looked at the 'proposed' issues yet. >> >>-Doug >> >> >> >>*Paul Fremantle <paul@wso2.com>* >> >>09/25/2005 07:03 PM >>Please respond to >>paul >> >> >> >>To >> >>cc >> ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org >>Subject >> [ws-rx-editors] Committee Draft issues >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>Editors >> >>Here is my figuring on what needs to go into the Committee Draft: >> >>Issues resolved up to and including the F2F to be included in CD >>================================================================ >> >>Issues closed, 4, 12, 14, 18 >> >>Issues requiring editor input from F2F >>====================================== >> >>i001 Bilateral sequence negotiation >>i005 Source resend of nacks messages when ack already received >>i011 Typo in expires P0S >>i013 Max message number in policy >>i015 Required Artifact Metadata >>i016 Document Identifiers >>i017 XML Namespace URIs >>i019 Sequence termination on Fault >>i027 InOrder delivery assurance spanning multiple sequences >>i028 Accurate final acknowledgement of a Sequence with gaps > > when > >>RMS decides to stop using it >> >>Issues resolved at the Seattle F2F >>================================== >> >>Issue 20 - meaning of at most once DA >>Issue 9 - policy assertion for Delivery Assurance. >> While this doesn't make HUGE amounts of sense without the text >>describing where it goes, I suggest we add it to the document - which > > is > >>what the vote agreed >> >>Issue 26 - space greedy. Closed >>Issue 24 - Observed text. >>Issue 25 - Seqack when no messages received. >>Issue 29 - Security Token Reference removed >>Issue 3 - Close, no action >>Issue 25 - Sequence ack where no messages received >>Issue 31 - Schema inconsistency >>Issue 33 - NACK processing >>Issue 34 - Faults on piggybacking >> >>NewProposed01 - DuplicateDetection of CSMs - closed no action >> >>Edits from Seattle F2F agreed as Action Items >>====================================== >>Proposed04 >>Proposed05 >>Proposed11 >>Proposed12 >> >> >>Proposed13 is NOT to be in CD (so as to minimise change bars) >> >> >>Paul >> >> >>-- >>Paul Fremantle >>Co-Founder, Vice President of Technology >>WSO2, "Oxygenating the Web Service Platform" >> >>Yahoo IM: paulfremantle >>Cell/Mobile: +44 (0) 7740 199 729 >>Fax: +1 360 485-4275 >>paul@wso2.com >> >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]