|
Paul,
I have to admit that I don't fully understand the
behavior of OO when comparing files with substantial changes between them. For
example, bot wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-01 and wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06 have 6 subsections
under chapter 3, yet the diff file has sub-sections 3.7 and 3.8 meanwhile
sub-section 3.1 is completely empty. I suspect that what happened was that the
original text (from cd-01) of:
/wsrm:CloseSequence/{any}
This is an extensibility
mechanism to allow different (extensible) types of information, based on a
schema, to be passed.
/wsrm:CloseSequence@{any}
This is an extensibility mechanism to allow additional
attributes, based on schemas, to be added to the
element.
was compared (for whatever reason) with the text (from
wd-06):
/wsrm:AckRequested/{any}
This is an
extensibility mechanism to allow different (extensible) types of information,
based on a schema, to be passed.
/wsrm:AckRequested@{any}
This is an extensibility mechanism to allow additional
attributes, based on schemas, to be added to the
element.
it genereated the fragment that you
noticed.
W/respect to the discussion on the
con-call today, I'm going to fix the date on ws-06 and publish it and the diffs
to the main TC page today.
-
g
I looked at this and
a big part of 3.7 is marked as deleted but there appears to be a fragment of
this section remaining. See lines 807-808.
From: Gilbert
Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
Sent: November 15, 2005 11:40
PM
To: Gilbert Pilz;
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Cc: Paul Cotton
Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] Publishing
wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
I've attached the
files I'm going to publish. If you review them you will notice that there are
more changes flagged than just those outlined in the resolution of i047. This
is due to the fact that I fixed one editorial nit (double spaces) before Doug
convinced me that we should stick to a strict interpretation of step (2)
below. I know its a bit confusing, but putting back a bunch of double spaces
is both tedious and a waste of time. Just consider it a preview of all the
nits to come . . .
-
g
From:
Gilbert Pilz
Sent:
Tuesday, November 15, 2005 2:04 PM
To:
ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx-editors] Publishing
wsrm-1.1-spec-wd-06
At the last F2F we agreed that
we would do the following:
2.) re-order the sub-sections
per Doug's suggestion
3.) re-publish the new
WD
Nobody said anything about
making any other changes in step (3). In the spirit of following the
directions of the TC I think we should publish wsrm-1.1-spec-wd06 (warts and
all) and address the various editorial flaws in
wd-07.
|