[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1 wd02 updated to include resolutionfor issues 22, 24, 54, 73
Yes. -Anish -- Yalcinalp, Umit wrote: > Anish, > > Is that going to be version 5 of the draft? > > > --umit > > > >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] >>Sent: Monday, Dec 05, 2005 11:02 AM >>To: Marc Goodner >>Cc: WS-RX Editors >>Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1 wd02 updated to >>include resolution for issues 22, 24, 54, 73 >> >>Marc, >> >>Thanks for looking at the doc and pointing out the missing issue. >>I included the issues that were agreed to on WebConf between >>Umit, Gil >>and me (which did not include issue 55). >> >>I have included issue 55 in the doc. Will upload in the next >>2/3 minutes. >> >>WRT the diffs, OO does not provide any options when exporting to PDF >>(except for compression related options) or when comparing docs :-( >> >>-Anish >>-- >> >>Marc Goodner wrote: >> >>>It looks like you missed applying i055. >>> >> >>http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/issues/ReliableMessagingIssue >>s.xml#i055 >> >>>"Delete inactivity timeout." >>> >>>Otherwise from a sanity check perspective this looks good. >> >>As you note >> >>>below the line number flux and the fact that some of the >> >>proposals only >> >>>use line numbers without text descriptions make this hard to review >>>without laying hard copies next to each other. >>> >>>Also, I've noticed a lot of weirdness in the diffs. I don't know if >>>these are being generated in OO or Acrobat, either way look for a >>>setting to ignore formatting differences. It really makes a >> >>mess with so >> >>>many lines marked deleted and new that are exactly the same. >>> >>>Regards, >>>Marc g >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Anish Karmarkar [mailto:Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com] >>>Sent: Thursday, December 01, 2005 6:24 PM >>>To: WS-RX Editors >>>Subject: [ws-rx-editors] wsrmp-1.1 wd02 updated to include >> >>resolution >> >>>for issues 22, 24, 54, 73 >>> >>>I have updated the wsrmp spec to include the resolution for >> >>issues 22, >> >>>24, 54, 73 as agreed today. >>> >>>The link for the sxw file is: >>> >> >>http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx-editors/dow >>nload.php/ >> >>>15709/wsrmp-1.1-spec-wd-02.sxw >>> >>>The PDF is attached to this email. The diff with CD01 (PDF) is also >>>attached. >>> >>>Please let me know if there is anything missing and I'll fix it. >>>Anything else needs to be done in WSRMP doc for the F2F? >>> >>>Please note that for some of the issue resolutions the line >> >>numbers did >> >>>not match (with the referenced spec in the resolution >> >>email) or were >> >>>incorrect. But I searched for the right text and made the >> >>changes at the >> >>>right places. In addition, I had to make changes to the text to >>>incorporate the resolutions. Specifically, because we >> >>deleted backoff >> >>>and retransmission params, the example in the spec changed >> >>(which was >> >>>part of the resolution), which meant that the line numbers in the >>>example changed (which was not part of the resolution), >> >>which meant that >> >>>the line numbers referenced in the text changed (which was >> >>not part of >> >>>the resolution). I consider these changes to be completely >> >>editorial and >> >>>do not see the need to go back to the TC to get the TC >> >>blessing (the TC >> >>>will bless it in any case when the next CD is approved). >>> >>>I did not upload the PDF as it may not be final (and I >> >>don't want to >> >>>version the PDF -- it is a 'Derived Object') and I'm not >> >>sure where to >> >>>upload it. Currently, the lastest ed drafts (wsrmp wd 02 >> >>and wsrm wd 07) >> >>>are under "Calendar Documents". Shouldn't we just create another >>>container for the latest docs? >>> >>>Thx! >>> >>>-Anish >>>-- >>
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]