ws-rx-editors message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] New editorial nits in RM policy
- From: Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>
- To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:22:08 -0500
In wd-06.
-Doug
"Marc Goodner"
<mgoodner@microsoft.com>
01/23/2006 01:46 PM
|
To
| <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
|
cc
|
|
Subject
| [ws-rx-editors] New editorial
nits in RM policy |
|
All,
I noticed a few other editorial problems
in the RM Policy spec today. Let me know if I should raise an issue about
these or if they’ll be addressed in the next draft.
- Line 118: The word version doesn’t make
sense in this line.
- Line 132, 135, 137, 140: Namespace of parameters
should be wsrmp, not wsrm.
Let me know if these should be formally
tracked or if they’ll be in the next draft.
Marc Goodner
Technical Diplomat
Microsoft Corporation
Tel: (425) 703-1903
Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/members/mrgoodner/
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]