Re: [ws-rx-editors] next CD? (or how to translate a member-only docURL to a public doc URL)

[Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>]

Marc,

I have noticed that like the email archive, every document in KAVI (at
least in WSRX) has a member-only URL and a public URL.

The member only URLs are typically:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/<some-numeric-id>/<doc-name>

The public URLs are typically:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/<some-numeric-id>/<doc-name>

If you see a member-only URL for a doc you can translate the URL to a
public URL be using the appropriate prefix (replace 
"apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx" with "committees" in the URL)

For example the member-only CD2 URLs are:
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/16271/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/ws-rx/download.php/16273/wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf

The equivalent public URLs are:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16271/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16273/wsrmp-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf

In fact the only important thing is the <some-numeric-id> everything 
else is irrelevant.

The URLs:
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16271/wsrm-1.1-spec-cd-02.pdf
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16271/complete-garbage
http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/16271/really-important

all return the same document.

Not sure if you are waiting for public URLs for updating the issues 
list, but thought I would mention. All of this doesn't help if things 
need to happen on http://docs.oasis-open.org.

-Anish
--

Marc Goodner wrote:
> Also, it isn’t our fault (that I can tell) but it sure would be nice if 
> the CD2 could get posted before we get to CD3. How long have we been 
> waiting on an answer now on that? Are we going to get to PR before any 
> of our approved CDs get posted? Honestly I’ve been sitting on a bunch of 
> the “done” issues that need to be changed to “closed” so that I can add 
> a remark pointing to the CD2 doc that closes them. This is really 
> starting to hurt.
> 
>  
> 
> Sanjay or Paul, have you guys heard anything yet?
> 
>  
> 
> Marc Goodner
> 
> Technical Diplomat
> 
> Microsoft Corporation
> 
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> 
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2006 1:32 PM
> *To:* Doug Davis; ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Subject:* RE: [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
> 
>  
> 
> I have plans to review today, at least as a first pass. I expect I’ll 
> get though a deeper review at the latest tomorrow afternoon.
> 
>  
> 
> Was a CD3 candidate asked for by the TC? Seems premature if not, I 
> suggest bringing this up on Thursday’s call and being ready to post it 
> afterwards. Not that I’m opposed, I’m actually inclined to think we 
> should do a CD before the F2F.
> 
>  
> 
> Marc Goodner
> 
> Technical Diplomat
> 
> Microsoft Corporation
> 
> Tel: (425) 703-1903
> 
> Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> *From:* Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
> *Sent:* Monday, February 20, 2006 1:13 PM
> *To:* ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
> *Subject:* [ws-rx-editors] next CD?
> 
>  
> 
> 
> All,
>   I just did a quick scan of the diffs between the last CD and the WDs 
> we have available.  I found two minor typos in the core spec but nothing 
> serious enough to regen everything.  Has anyone else looked at 'em 
> (aside from Anish) - I'd like to post 'em to the TC today as candidate 
> CD 3.
> thanks
> -Doug
>