OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

ws-rx-editors message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts


Mary,

There are a number of problems and most of them are my fault (how come
you never see the obvious stuff until its live?). The one thing I was
wondering if you could do anything about is to make
"wsrm-1.1-rddl-cd-02.html" the default page for
"http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rc/wsrm/200510/";? That way if anyone
dereferences the namespace URI they will immediately see the RDDL
document.

- gp 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 1:16 PM
> To: 'Patil, Sanjay'; 'Marc Goodner'; Gilbert Pilz
> Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robin Cover'; 'James 
> Bryce Clark'
> Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> 
> Please check and make sure the files are working as expected 
> ... Apparently some portion of the OASIS website header was 
> copied into the RDDL files; these aren't working properly. My 
> suggestion would be to just point to the OASIS logo from the 
> templates location and omit the rest of the heading.
> 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/OASISLogo.jpg
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Mary 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 1:48 PM
> > To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; Marc Goodner; Gilbert Pilz
> > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover; James 
> Bryce Clark
> > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > 
> > 
> > Mary,
> > 
> > Would it be possible to upload the WS-RX CD-02 artifacts today? The 
> > weekly meeting for our TC is scheduled for tomorrow and it would be 
> > great to have the CD-02 artifacts published and available 
> in advance 
> > of the weekly meeting.
> > 
> > -- Sanjay
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Mary McRae [mailto:marypmcrae@gmail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, Feb 22, 2006 10:38 AM
> > > To: 'Marc Goodner'; Patil, Sanjay; 'Gilbert Pilz'
> > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robin Cover'; 
> 'James Bryce 
> > > Clark'
> > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > 
> > > Hi Mark,
> > > 
> > >   I was actually trying to say that OASIS does *not* have
> > an explicit
> > > policy regarding the reserved use of keywords. I don't 
> believe the 
> > > issue had ever arisen in the past; staff has submitted this as an 
> > > issue to the Board TC Process Committee.
> > > 
> > > Regards,
> > > 
> > > Mary
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Marc Goodner [mailto:mgoodner@microsoft.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 12:21 PM
> > > > To: Patil, Sanjay; mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; Gilbert Pilz
> > > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover; James
> > > Bryce Clark
> > > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > > 
> > > > Mary, you imply that OASIS does now have some approved accepted 
> > > > policy regarding things like keywords and products.
> > > > I don't think that is correct. If there is an approved
> > policy that
> > > > covers this pleas provide a reference to it.
> > > > 
> > > > Marc Goodner
> > > > Technical Diplomat
> > > > Microsoft Corporation
> > > > Tel: (425) 703-1903
> > > > Blog: http://spaces.msn.com/mrgoodner/
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Patil, Sanjay [mailto:sanjay.patil@sap.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 8:05 AM
> > > > To: mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org; Gilbert Pilz
> > > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover; James
> > > Bryce Clark
> > > > Subject: RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Mary,
> > > > 
> > > > The use of the date identifier in the URI is a deliberate
> > > decision the
> > > > WS-RX TC made after sweating over a lot of discussions. 
> > > > Please note that
> > > > the product version identifiers are part of the artifact
> > names (last
> > > > token in the URI) in our scheme .
> > > > 
> > > > So I must say that currently we do not much choice and
> > > would strongly
> > > > prefer to keep the format of the URI as suggested in
> > Gil's original
> > > > email.
> > > > 
> > > > --Sanjay
> > > > WS-RX TC Co-Chair
> > > > 
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Mary McRae [mailto:mary.mcrae@oasis-open.org]
> > > > > Sent: Wednesday, Feb 22, 2006 7:23 AM
> > > > > To: 'Gilbert Pilz'
> > > > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; 'Robin Cover'
> > > > > Subject: [ws-rx-editors] RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi Gilbert,
> > > > > 
> > > > >   My apologies for the delay in responding; I've been 
> trying to 
> > > > > research the decision regarding the WS-RX TC's use of
> > > the keyword
> > > > > WSRM. It appears that since we did not have an explicit
> > policy in
> > > > > place reserving the keyword for use only by the WSRM
> > TC, and since
> > > > > the WSRM TC does not call its work product "wsrm", that
> > WS-RX is
> > > > > being allowed to use the WSRM as a product designation.
> > > > There's one
> > > > > other problem however,and that's the use of a date identifier 
> > > > > rather than a version number - The OASIS Library is
> > configured to
> > > > > identify TC work products by version number (i.e.
> > > > > docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/v1.1/). Is it possible for the 
> > > > > editors to reconfigure the documents to match that scheme?
> > > > > 
> > > > >   Thanks,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mary
> > > > > 
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Gilbert Pilz [mailto:Gilbert.Pilz@bea.com]
> > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 1:58 AM
> > > > > > To: Mary McRae
> > > > > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Robin Cover
> > > > > > Subject: RE: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Mary,
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Any word on the review of the WS-RX CD-02 artifacts? 
> > The rest of
> > > > > > the TC is going to want status from me on Thursday so
> > I need to
> > > > > > know what to tell them.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > - gp
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > From: Robin Cover [mailto:robin@oasis-open.org]
> > > > > > > Sent: Monday, February 13, 2006 2:04 PM
> > > > > > > To: Gilbert Pilz
> > > > > > > Cc: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org; Mary McRae
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: publish WS-RX CD-02 artifacts
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Mon, 13 Feb 2006, Gilbert Pilz wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Robin,
> > > > > > > >  
> > > > > > > > Attached is a zip archive containing the artifacts that
> > > > > > make up the
> > > > > > > > WX-RX TC's Committee Draft 02. The archive structure is
> > > > > > > intended for
> > > > > > > > unpacking under 
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx. You will
> > > > > > > notice that
> > > > > > > > we have included the RDDL documents 
> > > > > > > > "wsrm/200510/wsrm-1.1-rddl-cd-02.html" and 
> > > > > > > > "wsrmp/200510/wsrmp-1.1-rddl-cd-02.html". In order for
> > > > > > > things to work
> > > > > > > > as intended these files need to be the default page for 
> > > > > > > > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrm/200510/"; and 
> > > > > > > > "http://docs.oasis-open.org/ws-rx/wsrmp/200510/";
> > > respectively.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Please let me know if any of the above is unclear or
> > > > there is a
> > > > > > > > problem with organizing the web space in this way.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Gilbert Pilz
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Hi Gilbert,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I'm forwarding your request to Mary McRae, 
> currently listed
> > > > > > as one of
> > > > > > > the OASIS Staff Contacts for the WS-RX TC, and responsible
> > > > > > for the QA
> > > > > > > work on approved specs as delegated to the OASIS TC Admin.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I'm pleased that your TC has decided to use RDDL 
> documents: 
> > > > > > > it makes a lot of sense to me.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Congratulations on TC progress resulting in these
> > > > > approved CD specs.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Robin Cover
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> 
> 
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]