RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Latest WDs

[Doug Davis <dug@us.ibm.com>]

I see it in both OO and pdf version
- however, not all editors see it - I agree we need good line #s - Gil,
there have been times when you didn't see this problem - do you see it
now? If not perhaps you could regen the pdfs for the TC?
-Doug

"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>

06/13/2006 12:45 PM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS, <ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
cc
Subject	RE: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Latest WDs

I don’t understand the
“doesn’t see this issue” comment. Do you not see this in the pdf or
in OO? We obviously need good line numbers in the pdf to comment on the
drafts. Right now the drafts provided to the TC can’t really be used as
baselines because of this issue.
 
From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 9:45 AM
To: ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: Re: [ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Latest WDs
 

Already fixed the 15 vs 14 issue in the latest one.  Dunno what to
do about the line # issue other than get one of the other editors (who
doesn't see this issue) to produce the pdf files - or revert back to the
previous version of OO.  Gil did you ever hear from your friends at
Sun(?) who were going to take a look at this?
-Doug

"Marc Goodner" <mgoodner@microsoft.com>

06/13/2006 12:34 PM

To	Doug Davis/Raleigh/IBM@IBMUS
cc	<ws-rx-editors@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject	[ws-rx-editors] RE: [ws-rx] Latest WDs

 

The WD15 draft tile page still says WD14. The line numbers of WD15 alternate, randomly it seems, between 78, 79 and 80 from page 4 to page 60. Obviously we can’t use this as a base doc if we can’t cite line numbers.
 
The WD14 has line number issues as well, just not as extreme. Top of page 9 is a good example.
 
From: Doug Davis [mailto:dug@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, June 12, 2006 10:56 AM
To: ws-rx@lists.oasis-open.org
Subject: [ws-rx] Latest WDs
 

All,
I believe all outstanding issues have been applied to the editor's working drafts.  One suggestion, by Marc, was to move the wsdl to be after the schema (instead of after the sample messages) - we decided to do this change as the first change in a new WD so that people could see that diff in isolation.  I've attached three pdf diffs to this note:
      14-diff.pdf contains all of the outstanding editorial and issue related changes since WD13
      15-diff.pdf contains just the movement of the wsdl section
      10-diff.pdf contains WD10 of the policy spec
If there are additional changes needed please use WD15-diff.pdf's as the base doc. If there is a different version of the docs that people would like to see please let me know - hopefully, this addresses PaulC's concern mentioned on the last TC call.

thanks
-Doug